I5 8600k Vs I7 6700
Price now 297$ Games supported 99% Price now 182$ Games supported 97% Comparing Core i5-8600K and Cadre i7-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), compages, sales starting time time and price. Value for coin To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into business relationship the cost of other processors. Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more than precise assessment you lot have to consider their test results. Information on Cadre i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 compatibility with other figurer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (expect for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a time to come calculator configuration or upgrading an existing one. Annotation that ability consumption of some processors tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700. You'll probably need this data if y'all require some particular technology. Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for case, by protecting against hacks. Virtual car speed-up technologies supported past Core i5-8600K and Cadre i7-6700 are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Cadre i5-8600K and Core i7-6700. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Bachelor interfaces and connections of Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 integrated GPUs. Maximum display resolutions supported by Cadre i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. APIs supported by Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700. Diverse criterion results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if yous observe some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually set problems rapidly. Passmark CPU Marker is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating betoken math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is too one divide unmarried-threaded scenario measuring single-cadre functioning. Criterion coverage: 68% Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Picture palace 4D. Its single core version uses only one CPU thread to return a futuristic looking motorcycle. Criterion coverage: xx% Cinebench Release 10 Multi Cadre is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited past 16 in this version. Benchmark coverage: 19% 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX bundle. Criterion coverage: 19% wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, then that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Criterion coverage: 18% Cinebench Release 11.v Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Criterion coverage: 17% Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes chosen Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Criterion coverage: xiii% Cinebench R11.five is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded past later versions of Cinebench, which use more mod variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a unmarried thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room total of crystal spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: xiii% Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Movie theatre 4D. Information technology was superseded by afterwards versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Unmarried Cadre version (sometimes chosen Unmarried-Thread) only uses a unmarried processor thread to return a room total of reflective spheres and light sources. Criterion coverage: 13% TrueCrypt is a discontinued slice of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of deejay partitions, now superseded past VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded functioning tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Upshot is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. Information technology contains an internal speed examination, using 'Best' setting of RAR pinch on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Criterion coverage: 12% x264 Laissez passer 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable scrap rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher scrap rate is used when it is needed more. Criterion result is all the same measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Laissez passer 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant flake rate output file. Its effect is measured in frames per 2nd, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends Intel Core i5-8600K Should you still have questions on selection betwixt Core i5-8600K and Core i7-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Exercise you think nosotros are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" push button almost your favourite CPU. We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i5-8600K from AMD is FX-9590, which is nearly equal in speed and lower past 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Cadre i5-8600K: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-6700 by AMD is Ryzen 5 2400GE, which is slower by 1% and lower past 16 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-6700: Nosotros picked several similar comparisons of processors in the aforementioned market place segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Hither yous can meet how users rate the processors, besides as rate them yourself. Rate Intel Core i5-8600K on a scale of ane to 5: Rate Intel Cadre i7-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you lot can inquire a question nearly Cadre i5-8600K or Cadre i7-6700, concord or disagree with our judgements, or written report an mistake or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSIntel Core i5-8600K vs Cadre i7-6700
General info
Place in operation rating 664 801 Value for coin xiv.26 8.08 Market place segment Desktop processor Desktop processor Series Intel Cadre i5 Intel Core i7 (Desktop) Architecture codename Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) Skylake (2015−2016) Release date five October 2017 (4 years ago) 1 July 2015 (seven years ago) Launch cost (MSRP) $257 $303 Price now $297 (1.2x MSRP) $182 (0.6x MSRP) Technical specs
Physical cores 6 (Hexa-Core) 4 (Quad-Core) Threads half-dozen eight Base of operations clock speed 3.half dozen GHz 3.4 GHz Boost clock speed 4.3 GHz iv GHz L1 cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core) L2 cache 256K (per core) 256K (per core) L3 cache 9 MB (shared) 8 MB (shared) Chip lithography fourteen nm xiv nm Dice size 149 mm2 122 mm2 Maximum core temperature 100 °C no data Maximum instance temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C 64 bit support + - Windows 11 compatibility + - Unlocked multiplier + - Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1 Socket FCLGA1151 FCLGA1151 Thermal pattern power (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.one, Intel® SSE4.two, Intel® AVX2 AES-NI + + AVX + + vPro + + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + no data Turbo Boost Engineering 2.0 no information Hyper-Threading Engineering science + + TSX + + Idle States + no data Thermal Monitoring + + SIPP + + Security technologies
TXT + + EDB + no data Secure Key + no information MPX + + Identity Protection + + SGX Yes with Intel® ME no data Bone Guard + no information Virtualization technologies
AMD-V + + VT-d + + VT-x + + EPT + no data Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR3, DDR4 DDR3, DDR4 Maximum retention size 128 GB 64 GB Max retention channels ii 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s no information ECC memory support - - Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics card Intel UHD Graphics 630 - Max video memory 64 GB - Quick Sync Video + - Clear Video + - Articulate Video HD + - Graphics max frequency 1.15 GHz - InTru 3D + - Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported 3 - Graphics image quality
4K resolution back up + - Max resolution over eDP 4096x2304@60Hz - Max resolution over DisplayPort 4096x2304@60Hz - Graphics API support
Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 3.0 PCI Express lanes xvi 16 Benchmark operation
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 49 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.29 kh/s Gaming operation
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 9.85 vii.80 Novelty v October 2017 ane July 2015 Cost $257 $303 Boost clock speed 4300 4000 Base clock speed 3600 3400 Thermal design power (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of Core i5-8600K by AMD
Competitors of Core i7-6700 by AMD
Similar processor comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Core-i5-8600K-vs-Core-i7-6700
0 Response to "I5 8600k Vs I7 6700"
Post a Comment